Skip to Content

Interactive

“We Shape Our Tools...”

Interactive Dispatch

The Changing (Font) Face of Textbooks | Sep 6, 2011
Remember film strips in 6th grade science class? Or the teacher struggling to load a VHS tape into a BetaMax player? Rotary dial...
Status Update: On Vacation | Aug 8, 2011
So you’re on the road, and you have your phone with you for emergencies. You realize you didn’t pack enough beverages (...
The Wrapping Paper Isn’t the Present | Jul 6, 2011
It’s summertime – campers are roasting marshmallows over fire pits across the country, flies are being swatted, some people...
“We Shape Our Tools...” | Jun 13, 2011
“We become what we behold. We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us.” – Marshall McLuhan We’...
Never Mind “Web 2.0”, How’d You Do With “Web 1.0”? | May 12, 2011
Were you prepared for Web 2.0? Wait, were you prepared for Web 1.0? What are we talking about? When did that point release come out?
Out With the Old, Older, Oldest... | Apr 13, 2011
As happens every spring, it’s a good time to get rid of the junk in the closet and make some room for the new junk. Browsers can be...
“The Center Cannot Hold” | Mar 15, 2011
People have widely used the word “internet” as a synonym for “web,” when in fact “the internet”...
To App or Not to App | Feb 16, 2011
Maybe you have a smartphone, and maybe you’ve downloaded an app or two (or 40), and some you’ve paid for, and some were free...
Going Mobile | Jan 17, 2011
For the last couple of years, if you tried to look up a restaurant menu on your phone, you might get something like this:
A World of Hurt | Dec 15, 2010
“World of hurt” is really the best description of the developer’s task in putting together a rich text email, the kind...

We become what we behold. We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us.”
– Marshall McLuhan

We’ve been shaping a lot of tools in the past few years. With every transformation, something is gained, and something else is lost.

Hard to believe, email itself is (depending on who you ask) around 40 years old, and in some ways was the original impetus behind the world wide web itself: before the web, people just emailed attachments. Think about that: mailing lists without any links, a reliance on the user to save and search for them as necessary, and quote them back to other users, or ask someone to forward one. Someone eventually realized this was crazy and a traffic burden, and what was needed was a central repository where people could come and find things at their leisure. Hence usenet, and then the graphical/visual web. Something was gained; documents and lists had a permanent home. Something was lost; the onus was now on the user to check up and make sure they hadn’t missed anything important.

Email has had a long and fruitful history. It’s been gussied up with rich text, moved back to the web from the desktop, and become the most reliable indicator of who you are: you own your email address about as much as your social insurance number. And it’s being slowly replaced by other tools, including the web itself. Instant messaging, for one, trades length of message for convenience: short but fast to compose. Think of how many steps it takes to write an email: start typing a recipient’s name, tab down or click into a subject field, then tab or click down to the body field, compose a message, possibly inserting the cursor after a quoted message or in between the relevant parts. Instant messaging removes as many complexities as it can, so you don’t have to think about anything other than the content itself. Sure, we lose the archiving, the searching, the permanence of the email record; IMs are instantly disposable.

The web itself, the usurper, has also been challenged. Originally a static medium, a one-way publishing enterprise largely informed by the models of traditional print, became more interactive, allowing comments and user-generated content. Search engines began slowly, when it was a challenge to find anything on the web. Now there’s so much, the challenge is to filter out all the irrelevant results and focus on just the good stuff. Early experiments with “push” notifications were rolled into RSS, Really Simple Syndication, a means of “subscribing” to a website and getting notices when things had been added or updated. RSS is functional, but not pretty.

Comments were one of the first forms of social interaction (actually, “guestbooks” were first, but: a) they were implemented badly, and b) no one likes to talk about them), allowing a site owner to solicit and moderate visitor feedback, building a discussion around a topic. Website owners gained not just the feedback from users, but also the traffic from repeat visits, as people had more reason to come back to the same page again and again (pumping up precious page views). Site owners took on the moderating and de-spamming the comments, which for some, became a full-time job.

Comments and search and RSS are now somewhat being replaced with Twitter, Facebook and other social media services. We don’t need to search, or rely on RSS, when we have our own curated networks of friends and associates to help us determine what’s of value. Comments have become replaced with “Like” and “Tweet” (and now Google’s “+1”) buttons, which moved the ownership of comments and interaction from the blog or site owner into the visitor’s social sphere, but at the expense of truncating comments down to 140 characters or less – even just a very binary “yes/no”. What social networks bring, in addition to immediacy, is a form of credibility, a personal reference and authenticity from the people you trust and who trust you. What they lose, beyond control over the discussion, is a perspective outside our own immediate echo chambers. These tools may shape us more than ever.